Solar Panel Comparison

Power (PTC)

The solar module`s DC power output under PVUSA Test Conditions:

  • Solar irradiance of 1,000 W/m²
  • Air temperature at 25° C
  • Wind speed of 1 m/s, 10 m above ground level
PTC is generally regarded as a better measure of solar panel performance because PVUSA Test Conditions are more realistic.
Power (STC)

The solar module`s DC power output under Standard Test Conditions:

Efficiency

A measure of how much of the solar energy that hits the solar module is converted into electricity under Standard Test Conditions (STC):

Module Efficiency (%) = Power (STC) (W) / [Area (m²) x Irradiance (1,000 W/m²)]

Note that the efficiency of any given solar panel is dependent on many different variables including, but not limited to, temperature, irradiance angle and wind speed. Performance is therefore not constant and will vary throughout the day and between seasons.

The efficiency of an individual solar cell is typically higher than the efficiency of an entire solar module.

Power Density

Power density under Standard Test Conditions (STC) is calculated using the following formula:

Power Density (W/m²) = Power (STC) (W) / Area (m²)

A high power density, which is typically what you will find in mono- and polycrystalline solar modules indicate high area-efficiency. These are the types of solar panels someone with a limited roof should choose. Thin-film solar panels have low power density.

 

Cell Type

Cell type refers to what photovoltaic technology and materials the solar module is based own:

  • Mono (Monocrystalline silicon)
  • Poly (Polycrystalline silicon)
  • CdTe (Cadmium telluride)
  • a-Si (Amorphous silicon)
  • a-Si + micro-c (Amorphous and microcrystalline silicon)
  • CIS/CIGS (Copper indium gallium selenide)
  • Ribbon (String ribbon – a type of polycrystalline)

String ribbon solar panels are no longer in production. The remaining types belongs to the category of thin-film solar cells, which typically aren`t good choices in residential situations.

The majority of homeowners either go with mono- or polycrystalline silicon solar panels.

 

Read more about the various solar cell types and their benefits in Which Solar Panel Type is Best? Mono- vs. Polycrystalline vs. Thin Film.
CSI Approved

Whether or not a solar module is compliant with California Solar Initiative`s SB1 Guidelines. Only CSI-compliant solar modules are eligible for incentives in California.

 

Manufacturer and Module ID

The manufacturer and ID of the particular solar module you are looking at. Module IDs typically include rated power in standard testing conditions (STC).

 

Length, Width, Area and Weight

These terms are all self-explanatory, but keep in mind that the values are based on the international system of units. Length and width are measured in millimeters (mm), area in square meters (m²) and weight in kilograms (kg).

 

Temperature Coefficient

The temperature coefficient of a solar module is a measure of output loss or gain per degree Celsius (%/°C) starting at STC (25°C). Solar panels based on monocrystalline silicon are slightly more heat resistant compared to polycrystalline silicon. Thin-film solar panels tolerate heat well.

Comments

  1. Alwyn John says

    Please correct the chart entitled “Cell Type Summary”, your have more titles than you do data.

    Thanks

    AJ

  2. Chris says

    There are a lot of errors in this ranking when you sort by Panel Efficiency. 315 to 310Wp Poly panels which use Qty 72 156mm cells do not produce panel efficiencies above 16% efficiency. Several are noted in the 17.5% range and above.

  3. Dan says

    Looking for solar panels 120 watt range, must have 5 yr min workmanship and materials warranty as well as power warranty at 10 and 25. Would prefer US made.

    Dan

  4. says

    Efficiency is almost meaningless when it comes to real world performance. A 300 watt high efficiency solar module puts out pretty much the same 300 watts as a 300 watt low efficiency solar module. If the 300 watt solar module did put out more power, it would be labeled at a higher wattage. The only real difference between the two, is the physical size of each solar module. The higher the efficiency, the smaller the footprint. What really matters, according to the California Energy Commission, is the solar module’s PTC rating. And Hyper X solar modules offer a higher PTC to STC ratio than over 100 of Sunpower’s modules. Hyper X also offers a better temperature coefficient rating than SunPower for better performance in hot climates.

  5. says

    Finding the content herein pretty meaningless. Efficiency (as others have pointed out) is purely a product of STC/m2. Only real world comparison such as Photon Lab’s Outdoor Module Test is a truely comparative (useful) measure between panels.

  6. says

    There’s other useful data you could add if you want to go to the trouble. Great site thanks.
    1) Bypass Diodes / panel
    2) Pmax temperature deration
    3) Wholesale $/W
    4) links to datasheets

    Cheers

Add Comment Register



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>